the stuff shown here) retains moisture and stops weed growth. With regard to the second goal, it may be preferable to pesticides. But a lot of it stays on the ground, chewed up into little pieces and bleached by the sun. What will the landscape be like in 50 years if this continues?
Showing posts with label chemicals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label chemicals. Show all posts
Monday, May 26, 2008
Plastic Agriculture
Taiwanese farmers use a lot of plastic, but the more I think about it, the more I understand it. Plastic sheeting (like
the stuff shown here) retains moisture and stops weed growth. With regard to the second goal, it may be preferable to pesticides. But a lot of it stays on the ground, chewed up into little pieces and bleached by the sun. What will the landscape be like in 50 years if this continues?
the stuff shown here) retains moisture and stops weed growth. With regard to the second goal, it may be preferable to pesticides. But a lot of it stays on the ground, chewed up into little pieces and bleached by the sun. What will the landscape be like in 50 years if this continues?Thursday, May 15, 2008
A Tax On Ghost Money?
An anonymous letter writer to the Taipei Times thinks a tax on ghost money is a good idea. Here's his (her?) letter in its entirety:
I am writing this letter to highlight a significant problem for people living in Taiwan.Many recent news reports had showed that the air quality is getting worse. Most people are aware of the dangers of secondhand smoke. The government has designated no smoking areas in most public buildings and has stepped up non-smoking campaigns. It has even added a tax on cigarettes to decrease consumption and offset healthcare costs.
However, one kind of secondhand smoke still seems to be widely accepted by the public - even if it is potentially twice as harmful. It is highly concentrated and covers a wider area. I am referring to the smoke created by the burning of ghost money by both individuals and temples.
Every time my neighbors burn ghost money, my house is filled with a heavy smoke and strong odor. While it has been proven that the burning of ghost money causes the release of harmful and cancer-causing chemicals, the government has hardly taken any action to address this form of pollution.
What is strange is how the public seems to be oblivious to the impact it has or will have on children, the elderly and people with respiratory problems. People who would never think of smoking in a non-smoking area are the same ones who burn large wads of ghost money outside their homes without giving it a second thought. The problem is exacerbated when local temples burn ghost money in their large incinerators. In my area, the whole neighborhood is layered with gray smog. I live a few blocks from a temple and the air is terrible. I can't imagine what the air quality is like for people who live near the temple.
Since banning this practice is probably impossible, an alternative is in order. The government should place an environment tax on the sale of ghost money. Through this, people who insist on burning ghost money would have to offset the environmental and healthcare costs of doing so.
I foresee some problems. Some people will undoubtedly complain that by taxing ghost money, the government is infringing on their rights. Also, if the tax is especially high, contraband ghost money (which, in terms of chemicals could be even worse than the stuff currently being burned) will appear.
As the letter writer says, the money raised by a tax could be used to offset the environmental and healthcare costs of burning ghost money. But instead of having those costs offset, I'd prefer to see less ghost money going up in smoke.
I think ghost money is like cigarettes in that demand for it is fairly price inelastic. It's not addictive, but people think it's necessary. A price hike may not do much. Religious institutions should be pushed to educate their followers about the hazards of this habit. Certain temples do already discourage the burning of ghost money: Xingtian Temple in Taipei is one.
The Environmental Protection Administration and local governments are doing something. And it's worth remembering that it's not just foreigners who complain about the burning of ghost money.
According to Michael Turton's blog, ghost money that is offered (but not burned) sometimes get recycled. I've never seen this.
Sunday, April 13, 2008
Coconut-Fiber Brushes
Scientists have been experimenting with biodegradable plastic bags made partly of coconut fiber. Also, here in South Taiwan, coconut fiber mats have been used on slopelands to hold soil in place until plants and trees have taken root; this was done along the banks of the Love River.
I'm curious: Was the coconut fiber imported or grown here in Taiwan? How efficiently are the coconut palms used? According to some sources, nearly all parts of the coconut palm are useful.
Saturday, April 12, 2008
Toxic Agents On Disposable Chopsticks
Disposable chopsticks may not have other people's saliva or soap suds on them, but that doesn't mean using them is good for your health, according to this article.
A consumers' group leader is quoted as saying: "The best solution is to use your own pair of reusable chopsticks to protect the environment and your health."
How clean are the paper or plastic bags that are given out by hot-food vendors and people selling fruit and vegetables in markets? That's something I'd like to know.
A consumers' group leader is quoted as saying: "The best solution is to use your own pair of reusable chopsticks to protect the environment and your health."
How clean are the paper or plastic bags that are given out by hot-food vendors and people selling fruit and vegetables in markets? That's something I'd like to know.
Saturday, March 22, 2008
Gargling With Detergent
Taiwan's Cheng Hsiu University has come up with an environmentally-friendly detergent.
According to the report, a translation from a local Chinese-language newspaper, it's safe to gargle. The research was done at the behest of a reform institution run by the Ministry of Justice. It doesn't say why such a place would make such a request: To stop prisoners using it to kill themselves, maybe?
According to the report, a translation from a local Chinese-language newspaper, it's safe to gargle. The research was done at the behest of a reform institution run by the Ministry of Justice. It doesn't say why such a place would make such a request: To stop prisoners using it to kill themselves, maybe?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
